“[Miss Hughes’] written and oral advocacy were exemplary”
Ruth has a broad Chancery practice focused on litigation. The main areas of her practice are Trust and Estate disputes, Court of Protection and contentious Tax.
Ruth has appeared in (and cross-examined) in highly complex and valuable cases including the Ingenious tax-avoidance litigation, a film scheme concerning financing films such as Avatar, Life of Pi and Shaun of the Dead. The amount at stake is c. £1bn.
Ruth has represented the Attorney-General (unled) in the Court of Appeal in the high-profile Quan v Bray divorce litigation where the wife is seeking to break a Mauritian trust for the benefit of the endangered South China Tiger. 22 tigers live on the trust’s land in South Africa worth £25m.
Ruth regularly appears in the High Court and the Court of Protection where she is frequently instructed by the Official Solicitor.
Ruth has been appointed to the Attorney-General’s B Panel.
Chambers UK 2017 Court of Protection
"Very hard worker who is an extremely well organised and persuasive advocate. She isn’t afraid to get stuck in, and she fights her clients’ corner hard."
Chambers UK 2016 Court of Protection
"She is really fantastic on her feet."
Chambers UK 2015 Court of Protection
"Very knowledgeable and thorough."
About Ruth Hughes
“Very hard worker who is an extremely well organised and persuasive advocate. She isn’t afraid to get stuck in, and she fights her clients’ corner hard.”
Chambers UK 2017 – Court of Protection
“She’s got a fantastic knowledge of this area and very much has an eye on the welfare issues. She is really fantastic on her feet. She is really practical and makes sure the protected party is being looked after. She is absolutely in her element in this work.”
Chambers UK 2016 – Court of Protection
“Very knowledgeable and thorough”
Chambers UK 2015 – Court of Protection
“a focused, bright, effective barrister who is tenacious on her feet”
Chambers UK 2014 – Court of Protection
The core of Ruth’s practice is contentious probate and family provision claims including claims involving, lack of capacity, want of knowledge and approval, mutual wills and testamentary proprietary estoppel. Ruth frequently acts in relation to administration disputes including the removal of trustees/personal representatives and claims involving allegations of breach of trust/duty. Ruth often advises in respect of the proper construction of wills and trusts and rectification. Ruth has experience of dealing with trust issues in divorce. She often advises on Inheritance Tax and Capital Gains Tax issues in estates and trusts.
Recent experience includes
- Quan v Bray  – a three-day Court of Appeal hearing relating to a divorce. Instructed for the Attorney-General to defend charity. Ruth appeared against Richard Todd QC and Stewart Leech QC and was praised by King LJ for the quality of her written and oral advocacy which was described as exemplary.
- Re Stanley  – a three-day testamentary proprietary estoppel claim. Instructed by Linder Myers LLP
- Zarrinkhat v Kamal  WTLR 1477 – acted for the beneficiary in an adult child claim under the 1975 Act
- Bennett v Petit  EWHC 988 (Ch) – three-day want of knowledge and approval claim. Instructed by Russell-Cooke LLP
- Close v Abaowa  EWHC 1920 (QB) – a five-day fraud trial involving the beneficial ownership of property, resulting trusts and the presumption of advancement
- Re King  EWHC 3939 (Ch) – instructed for the unborn and unascertained beneficiaries of a divorce settlement in an application under the Variation of Trusts Act 1988. Instructed by Withers LLP
- Ruth acted in the Thorner v Major litigation concerning testamentary proprietary estoppel
- Ruth acted for the Official Receiver in the K v A divorce proceedings before Charles J.
Ruth often undertakes work that involves cross-border issues.
Ruth is one of the leading barristers of her level of seniority in Property and Affairs cases, although she also undertakes welfare claims. Ruth is often instructed by the Official Solicitor for example in statutory gift and statutory will cases and cases involving an element of welfare. Ruth’s experience advising on capital taxation issues, and in drafting wills and trusts is particularly helpful in this area. She has been involved in complex international cases.
- Watt v ABC  4 WLR 24 – acted for ABC’s litigation friend in this case concerning whether a deputy or a personal injury trust was in ABC’s best interests
- Re Jones  EWCOP 59 WTLR 661 – acted for the Official Solicitor in this multi-jurisdictional statutory will claim involving complex taxation issues
- Re E  EWCOP 27  Med LR 417  Med LR 417 – acted for the Official Solicitor in this case which involved an injunction to restrain the removal of E from the jurisdiction and the validity of her living will
- Re Meek  EWCOP 1  COPLR 535 – appeared for the Official Solicitor in this high-profile statutory will and security bond application
- Re AS; SH v LC  COPLR 29 – an application for a deputyship by a professional
- Re MN  WTLR 1719 with David Rees – the first reported case on Sch 3 to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 concerning the abduction of a mentally incapacitated person from the US. Instructed by Lawrence Graham LLP.
Ruth often appears in contentious tax disputes including customs work. She has particular experience of cases concerning bonded warehouses and also business premises renovation allowances.
- Ingenious Games LLP v HMRC   STI 1655,  UKFTT 521 (TC),  STC 1659 with Malcolm Gammie CBE QC et al – Ruth continues to be involved in these valuable and complex appeals concerning the financing of Avatar, Life of Pi and Shaun of the Dead using a GAAP scheme in which she undertook the examination of both witnesses of fact and expert witnesses
- HT and Co (Drinks) Ltd v HMRC with Stephen Nathan QC – Ruth has been involved in both the Tax Tribunal and Judicial Review aspects of this dispute concerning the legality of HMRC’s decision to impose conditions on and subsequently close a bonded warehouse
- Perfect v HMRC  UKFTT 639 (TC) – Ruth was involved in this case which considered the issue of the knowledge required to be “holding” smuggled goods at the duty point for the purposes of liability for excised duty
- Abbey Forwarding (in liq) v HMRC  EWHC 225 (Ch)  Bus LR 882 with Stephen Nathan QC and Sarah Harman – an important decision on when the court will enforce the undertaking in damages given to support the appointment of a provisional liquidator. Ruth acted for HMRC
- Abbey Forwarding v Hone  Ch 309 with Stephen Nathan QC and Sarah Harman – Ruth acted in this appeal in relation to an inquiry into damages following the discharge of a freezing order which clarifies the law regarding the measure of loss.
- HMRC v San Marco London Ltd  UKFTT 712 (TC) – appeared for HMRC in this strike-out application in relation to an appeal to reinstate a trader’s licence to trade duty suspended alcohol
Ruth is an accredited mediator, trained through ADR Chambers
Graduated from Trinity Hall Cambridge, 2006, First class (Bateman Scholar)
Erskine Chambers Prize for Company Law
Called to the Bar 2007, Lincoln’s Inn (Levitt Scholar)
Member of the Judicial Appointments Committee advisory panel
Member of the Equality and Diversity Committee of the Bar Council
Elected member of the committee of the Chancery Bar Association
Ruth has taught company law on the Bar Vocational Course and has contributed to the Trust Quarterly Review and other professional journals. She has written headnotes for the Wills and Trusts Law Reports. She is also on the editorial board of the Elder Law Journal and a correspondent for Private Client Business. Ruth lectures on all areas of her practice and in particular proprietary estoppel, mutual wills, tax and family provision.